Disclaimer: This document provides legal information only and does not replace the need for professional legal advice in individual cases. While every effort has been made to ensure the information is accurate, the EDO does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage resulting from any error in this document or use of this work.

EDO NSW has been making recommendations for strong biodiversity, native vegetation and land management laws since 1995. We were heavily involved in the development of the current Native Vegetation Act between 2002 and 2005. 

We met with the Independent Biodiversity Legislation Review Panel during their deliberations and produced A Legal Assessment of NSW Biodiversity Legislation to assist the panel. We engaged with representatives of the Office of Environment & Heritage, Department of Primary Industries and Department of Planning during targeted stakeholder consultations prior to the public exhibition process. We raised a number of key concerns and made recommendations in these meetings based on our extensive expertise in NSW environmental law.

Unfortunately none of these fundamental concerns or recommendations were addressed in the package developed for public consultation. 

These submissions detail our conclusion that the proposed laws are a retrograde step for NSW biodiversity and land management. While the proposed investment private land conservation is welcome, once this money runs out, we will be left with weak laws that offer no real protection for our unique threatened species and ecological communities and will facilitate ongoing decline in biodiversity. Consequently, we cannot support the proposed package.

Through a series of workshops, seminars and forums, we have spoken to localย communities, Landcare members, Local Land Services officers, local councils, ecologicalย consultants, private land conservation agreement holders, Aboriginal people,ย conservationists, wildlife carers, and private individuals through our advice line. Areasย covered include: Hunter, Greater Sydney, North Coast, Northern Tablelands, South East andย Central West. We discussed concerns with over 600 people. With the exception ofย representatives of the NSW Farmers Association, no-one we spoke to told us the proposedย laws were an improvement on current laws, and almost all participants were seriouslyย concerned at the implications of the new regime for biodiversity.

2016

2017