link to EDO NSW home page


EDO fact sheets
These Fact Sheets are a guide only and are no substitute for legal advice relating to your particular issue. If you need legal advice about your particular issue, please call our FREE Environmental Law Advice Line

The information in this fact sheet is up-to-date as of January 2011.
Print this factsheetPrint friendly version

2.1 LEPs and SEPPs

2.1.1
2.1.2 Environmental Planning Instruments (EPIs)
2.1.3
2.1.3a
2.1.3b The Standard Instrument
2.1.4 State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs)
2.1.5 Other planning documents

2.1.4 State environmental planning policies (SEPPs)

State Environment Planning Policies (SEPPs) are environmental planning instruments which address planning issues within the State.

The practical effect of a SEPP is often to take power away from local councils in order to prohibit certain types of development in an area or to allow certain types of development even where local controls prohibit it. SEPPs often make the Planning Minister the decision-maker (consent authority) for the types of development they relate to.

Click here to view all SEPPs.

2.1.4.1 Examples of SEPPs

Examples of some of the more important SEPPs are described below.

SEPP 1 - Development Standards

This Policy enables the flexible interpretation of development standards in LEPs. For example, if a developer's proposal meets the objectives of an LEP, but not some of the standards set by the LEP, such as the floor space ratio or height restrictions, they can apply for an exemption from those standards (SEPP 1 objection). 1

However, the new Standard LEP Instrument now sets out the circumstances when a development standard in an LEP or SEPP can be varied, 2 and once a council adopts the new standard LEP, SEPP 1 will cease to apply in that local government area. The Planning Department intention is to repeal SEPP 1 once all councils have adopted new LEPs using the Standard Instrument.

SEPP 4 - Development Without Consent and Miscellaneous Exempt and Complying Development

This Policy permits certain development by public authorities without development consent. It also makes minor development which is auxiliary to existing development, such as fences for existing houses, permissible without consent.

SEPP 14 - Coastal Wetlands

This Policy provides additional protection for coastal wetlands by requiring development consent to be obtained before any clearing, draining, filling or construction of levees can take place on a mapped wetland. These developments will also require an environmental impact statement and the concurrence (agreement) of the Director-General of DECCW before consent can be granted. See Fact Sheet 5.5 on Coastal Protection for more information.

SEPP 26 - Littoral Rainforests

This Policy seeks to protect coastal rainforests (littoral rainforests) by requiring development consent for development in or adjacent to mapped coastal rainforest areas. An environmental impact statement and the concurrence (agreement) of the Director-General of DECCW may also be required under this Policy.

SEPP 33 - Hazardous and Offensive Development

This Policy contains additional requirements that must be met before development consent can be granted for hazardous and offensive industries. For example, the developer must carry out a preliminary hazard analysis, and the consent authority must consider additional matters.

SEPP 44 - Koala Habitat Protection

This Policy seeks to protect koala habitat by requiring a plan of management for all developments in core koala habitat, and by encouraging core koala habitat to be included in environment protection zones in LEPs.

Case study: Nambucca Valley Conservation Association Inc v Nambucca Shire Council & Anor

The Nambucca Valley Conservation Association Inc (NVCA) brought proceedings in the Land and Environment Court challenging the decision of Nambucca Shire Council to allow a rural residential development to proceed in core koala habitat.

The NVCA's concerns include the incremental loss of koala habitat and the impact on koala 'corridors' as a result of the proposed development; the refusal of Council to carry out the necessary public exhibition of the amended proposal; and the timing and manner in which the Council made its decision.

On 18 March 2010, Justice Biscoe upheld the NVCA's challenge and the development consent was declared invalid.

The Court held that the Council had failed to take into account public submissions made in relation to an earlier version of the development. In addition, the Council failed to advertise the final version of the development, which had changed significantly from the first application in 2003 to the final version in 2008.

SEPP 71 - Coastal Protection

This Policy seeks to protect land in the coastal zone by identifying State significant development in the coastal zone, requiring the referral of certain development applications to carry out development in sensitive coastal locations to the Director-General of DECCW for comment, and requiring some subdivisions in the coastal zone to have master plans.

For more information on SEPP 71, see Fact Sheet 5.5 on Coastal Protection.

SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007)

This SEPP repealed 20 other SEPPs 3 which largely dealt with category-specific State infrastructure (eg prisons, tips, educational facilities), and replaced them with a single, comprehensive SEPP to facilitate the development of State infrastructure. The new Policy deals with a wide range of State infrastructure, such as telecommunications facilities, sewerage works and storm water management, and specifies when development consent is (and is not) required for such development to be carried out in certain zones.

SEPP (Major Development) 2005

This Policy identifies the types of development to which the development assessment and approval process under Part 3A of the EPA Act applies. The Policy also makes the Planning Minister the approval authority for these developments and for sites of State significance.

2.1.4.2 How are SEPPs made?

Planning Minister makes SEPPS

The Planning Minister makes SEPPs.4 A SEPP can be made where they are "for the purpose of environmental planning by the State".5

Minister chooses whether public consultation is required

There are no mandatory public consultation requirements which must be met before a SEPP is made. The Planning Minister can publicise an explanation of the intended effect of a proposed SEPP, and seek and consider public submissions, but only if the Minister so chooses. 6

Consultation with DECCWwhere SEPP affects threatened species

Special consultation procedures apply concerning threatened species. If threatened species, populations, ecological communities or their habitats will or may be adversely affected by the SEPP, then the Director-General of the Department of Planning must consult with the Director-General of DECCW. 7

 

  1. SEPP 1, cl 7.
  2. Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006, cl 23.
  3. SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007, Sch 4.
  4. EPA Amendment Act 2008, Sch 1.1 [9]; EPA Act, s 37.
  5. EPA Amendment Act 2008, Sch 1.1 [9]; EPA Act, s 37.
  6. EPA Amendment Act 2008, Sch 1.1 [9]; EPA Act, s 38.
  7. Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Act 2008 No 36, Sch 1.1 [7]; EPA Act, (new) s 34A.

 


EDO NSW homeThis site was last updated Wednesday 8 February, 2012
Environmental Defender's Office (Ltd) NSW

Home
| Disclaimer | Privacy | Contact Us | Support the EDO